Between :-
I.A.No. 2 of 2021 IN CONTEMPTCASENo. 1369 of 2020
Sri Vadrevu Chinaveerabhadrudu, I.A.S., Director of School Education, A.P.,
Anjaneya Towers, Road No. 7/104, B Block, 4th VTPS Road,
Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna District.
AND
…. Petitioner / Respondent No.1 In C.C.No. 1369 of 2020.
1.Velaga Venkateswaramma, 0/0. V. Venkateswara Rao, Occ : School
Assistant(Hindi), Z.P.H.S. (Girls), Vinukonda,
Guntur District .
. . Respondent! Petitioner. In C.C.No. 1369 of 2020.
2.Smt R.S. Ganga Bhavani, District Educational Officer, Guntur,
Guntur District. (Respondent No.2 is not necessary to this
petition)
Petition under Section 70(2) Cr.P.c., 1973
praying that in the circumstances stated in
the affidavit filed in support
of the petition, the High Court may
be pleased to recall the
non-bailable warrant issued
against the petitioner herein/respondent
No.1 in CC.No. 1369 of 2020 dated 6.1.2021.
WHEREAS the. said case coming on for hearing, and
whereas the High Court, upon perusing the
affidavit filed therein and earlier
orders of this Hon’ble Court dt. 14-12-2020,
30-12-2020 and 06-01-2021 made herein and
upon hearing the arguments of and of the Govt.
Pleader for Services-Ilion behalf of petitioner
and of Smt Kavitha Gottipati,
Advocate for respondent No.1, the
Court made the following
ORDER:-
,”By an order dated 06.01.2021 on account
of non appearance of the petitioner, who
is the first respondent in the contempt case, a
non-bailable warrant was directed to be issued to secure his
presence subject to certain directtons; In -this
petition, it request is now made to recall
the warrant so issued. Unfortunately, the
reasons stated in I.A.No. 1 of 2021,
which was di.smissedon 06.01.2021 are
reiterated in the present petition
and those reasonswere already rejected by the above order
dated 06.01.2021.
presented through learned G.P. for
services-III, who volunteered to file
vakalat on an earlier occasion on behalf
of the petitioner. Instead
of appearing as an advocate for the
contemnor if instructed for such
purpose, this practice is repeated
now. Therefore, the application
filed in’ I.A.No.2 of 2021
presented through learned G.P. for Services -III, on this short
ground is not maintainable.
Director of School Education, A.P. He appears
to have a long career. Upon dismissal of this
present petition, the option left to the Court
is to commit him to prison. But in view of the above
reason and not to see that his career did not suffer any dent by
the action of this Court, it is desirable
to accept request of Sri K. Bhima
Rao, learned counsel (who is now G.P. for
Services -III), who offered assistance in this
matter, to recall the non-bailable
warrant. Ms. Jampani Sridevi, learned
counsel also filed vakalat now as an advocate for the
petitioner.
which in fact do not stand for any consideration in
view of dismissal of I.A.No.1 of 2021
earlier, only on humanitarian consideration and with
the fond hope that the petitioner would not
repeat similar act in future, who is
duty bound to appear before the Court
when his presence is sought, non-bailable
warrant directed to be issuedon 06.01.2021
stands recalled
appear before this Court on all the
dates of hearing in the contempt
case unless otherwise ordered in due
course. The petitioner is directed
to execute a bond for this purpose of
Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand only) and Registry is
directed to take his personal bond
accordingly. The petitioner shall
appear on 18.01.2021 at 2.15 p.m.”
